A wake-up call for railway industry
Discussion on deteriorating
financial health of Indian Railways(IR) is passé and maybe, even irrelevant.
Comptroller & Accountant General(CAG) may go on calling out that IR’s
finances are window-dressed and it camouflages the reality by excluding pension
payments and other jugglery but the government has made up its mind. It is not
a question any more whether the plethora of infrastructure projects make sense in the
background of lacklustre performance of IR and the competition it faces from
road and air. Surely the government is aware of the financial health but it has
gone firm in its belief that rail infrastructure is needed for the country’s
base of logistics in the economy as a whole and viewing IR’s financial health
in isolation in not important, at least in short term. Large-scale Capex,
which has mounted steadily since 2014, almost five times from around 50000 cr.
to as much as 2.45 lakh cr., is here to stay.
IR has moved at
breakneck speed to acquire new rolling stock. This year is going to be a
transformational juncture, with far-reaching impacts, what with finalization of
IR’s biggest ever contract for acquiring nearly 75000 wagons in three years at
approx. Rs 27000 crores and bids called for more than Rs. One lakh cr. for
twelve hundred 9000 hp locomotives, eight hundred 12000 hp locomotives, two
hundred Vande Bharat equivalent trains, one hundred Aluminium train sets
and another hundred Aluminium push-pulls trains for which orders would be placed
on non-IR entities, most likely private ones in this fiscal itself. Huge tenders
for special wagons and EMUs are reportedly on the way.
For once, all the hype on rail sector is
accompanied by some determined and firm action. It calls for analysis at
various levels. But before that, it is a given that there are going to be spin-off
benefits of this money being ploughed into the rail sector in
respect of revitalizing key sectors like Steel, Cement, Aluminium and generating employment.
Analysis and reviews will continue on rail
finances and the roadmap for corporatization and privatization. Meanwhile, this is seemingly
an elegant way of infusing technology & bringing private participation,
even while proclaiming that IR would not be privatized, killing many birds with
one stone. Since I always suggest that a sensible move forward would be to have
a judicious mix of public and private
involvement, I would see it as a positive move.
What I would briefly talk about today is how these changes are poised to shake the existing railway equipment and component suppliers out of their smug comfort zones to compete and improve quality as the private rolling stock majors would not be saddled with government procurement rigmarole. One caveat, I always say that the public procurement policies are not disablers but enablers (readers with time can go through my two blogs on the subject given below).
Blogs references:
http://anindecisiveindian.blogspot.com/2022/06/public-procurement-and-cartelization.html
http://anindecisiveindian.blogspot.com/2019/03/train-18-series-part-19.html
A majority of those in government babudom, however,
are ambivalent, unwilling to stick to their guns and failing to call a
spade a spade. Talking of IR, its public procurement therefore has, inter alia,
innumerable ills, and that for critical equipment and components, with
situation for common non-critical items being even worse; to quote a few:
· Indiscriminate ordering on development sources ultimately
leading to a long list of approved vendors with capacities far in excess of
IR’s requirement and the subsequent counterproductive cut-throat price war,
which in turn, may look like a good price deal but leads to cutting corners and
poor quality. In many cases, it leads to cartelization, which may be like a last resort to maintain the quality but the practice itself is undeniably unhealthy.
· Undue stress on inspections, tests and audits whereas such measures are confirmatory regimes which cannot inculcate inherently-strong consciousness about quality; quality cannot be built in by inspection.
· Disconnect between IR and its suppliers and
absence of a spirit of long-term partnership and empathy. Liquidated Damages
are imposed on good and bad suppliers alike as if it was a means of
profiteering; since certain rules have been prescribed, officers see no premium
in using any judgment.
· No robust system of costing and the only benchmark
is the Last Purchase Price (LPR).
Production Units are the biggest purchasers of
railway equipment and components and once a lot of their products would be
built by private rolling stock majors, albeit in their premises, the product
mix would change drastically and procurement of stores from entrenched vendors
shall taper off due to diminishing production of conventional rolling stock
manufactured at present. The system of procurement would change drastically and
product costing and quality will become paramount. Vendors would need to have certifications
like International Railway Industry Standard(IRIS), be amenable to a smart, digital and connected progress with Industry 4.0 (the fourth
generation of industrial activity) and its attendant automation leading to efficiency,
capacity and cost benefits, robust designs of products which are relatively
maintenance-free or tractable with condition monitoring tools to reduce
unplanned maintenance and integration with an effective supply chain web to
reduce production hold-ups and inventory costs.
The existing railway manufacturers must be alive
to the changing scenarios or they run the risk of getting run over by the
sweeping changes; this is what happened when diesel locomotive production was
halted suddenly and many diesel component suppliers went under.
A wake-up call for the established manufacturers in the rail sector as they would no longer be dug in! At the same time, a great opportunity for the capable among exiting ones to diversify and expand and new good ones to enter, and as for poor pretenders, they should devise a strategy to vacate the sector.
Yes, that is the hope
but who knows for sure? Camillo in The Winter’s Tale, advises Perdita and Prince Florizel to flee with him to a
welcoming court, dissuading them from running away by sea to wherever the wind
might take them. What the lovers did is immaterial but a glimpse of them
setting sails for shores that lay undiscovered is very fascinating and such a
fascinating glimpse has been afforded to us:
A course more promising,
Than a wild dedication of yourselves
To unpathed waters, undreamed shores…
Or, may I add, all good men
connected with railways in India should look ahead with the help of Allama Iqbal:
Sitāroñ se aage jahāñ aur bhī
haiñ
abhī ishq ke imtihāñ aur bhī haiñ
(There is world beyond the stars and many inquests of love that I
still have to go through.)
…
This reminds me of my experience while working as purchaser with Railways. I went for inspection of a vendor in Indore. I checked the status of all outstanding orders from Railways and the production capacity of vendor’s manufacturing unit. A simple calculation showed that at current rate of manufacturing, he will take 11 years to complete the orders. I asked him why you do not increase your production capacity. He shot back asking if I am promising him a long term relationship.
ReplyDeleteWe may curse the existing system easily but all public procurement happens with ambit of Indian Contract Act, Sales of Goods Act, Arbitration Act, Stores Code, Finance code …you name it. Then the ever watchful eyes of Vigilance, Account, Audit and management, which always considers procurement as essentially corruption do not leave many options for the purchase officer.
I think the focus should be to release the shackles on existing procurement rather than shun it and adopt a more complicated system.
In my very long experience, I haven’t seen productivity of shed or workshop going down barring few genuine exceptions. The way to go is to improve upon it rather than curse it.
Just wanted to explain the other side of story
I have used government approval and procurement system effectively but I also know, and seen enough, to know that the system does not throw up quality vendors forever...
DeleteHaving worked with Public sector (Railways) for 20 years and private sector for 10 years and having a US Masters degree in supply chain management, I can assure that this is a case for Business process re-engineering within organisation and then Railways will be able to get quality vendors
DeleteI wonder whether, with all these huge procurements in a short time, IR is not getting into a debt trap.
ReplyDeleteSir, they are in a debt trap but that debt would be underwritten by the govt....just as Extra Budgetary Support today is a subsidy, no dividend to be paid on that
DeleteProcurements in IR must be left to market forces slightly monitored to ensure Good Quality since there are more than 10,000 Small & Medium Rail Companies with Goodwill of 3 Generations
Delete1. 2015 - Debroy committee recommended corporatization of PU, to be named as IRMC (Indian Railway Manufacturing Corporation).
ReplyDelete2. 2015-19: Nothing happened,
3. 2019: Post Lok-Sabha election, media reports came out that the Govt. is keen to corporatize the PUs; within 100days, blah-blah. No luck.
4. 2020: Pandemic struck. CRB Yadav said "talks/consultation are on going within the cadre - whether to form: one joint rolling stock company OR two companies {1. for Coaches (mechanical) & 2. for Locos (Elec)}. Still no luck..
5. 2021: Piyush leaves the scene; Ashwini arrives. Ordinance Factories corporatized. Farmers forced the bearded guy to withdraw on the farm laws. Sanyal issues some report on corporatization of PUs. Media sensationalize the report. Still, no action..
6...don't know what's cooking up in Ashwini's mind. Seems the govt. has given up on PU corporatization for the time being. As is the case with Rail Development Authority (RDA) & private-trains..
7...come 2024: post-LS election, one can hope for corporatization. Whatever the appointed date is, whenever it happens, it will happen with stealth.
😉🤣
Delete