Are there wheels within wheels in Train 18 delays?
Wheels have been in the news recently because the wheels for Train
18/Vande Bharat express, under manufacture at Integral Coach Factory, Chennai,
had been ordered on a company in Ukraine and the first lot itself was stuck in
the war zone.
I reproduce only two of the news items here:
Hindustan times
Live Mint
The matter has been resolved for the time being with wheels for one rake
arriving in Chennai and there is no setback in the timeline for the first rake,
which in any case, was not going to be out before June 22. The questions
raised, however, need to be addressed and the essence of these questions is
simple:
Why does India need to import wheels?
Why is India not Atmanirbhar even in a basic part of a train, the wheel?
Railroad wheels are largely of two types: cast or roll-forged. One can
get into a complicated engineering discussion and propound that forged wheels,
their metallurgy and impact strength are more suited for trains, particularly
at higher speeds. Perhaps true, but it is not so straightforward. Legacy of
development of railroad wheels is basically in play here. While the
manufacturers in USA adopted cast wheels, those in Europe and Japan developed
forged wheels and after that it has been more about commercial pitching by
companies. Since US did not have a vibrant system of passenger trains vis-à-vis
Europe, passenger trains worldwide employ only forged wheels; it’s notable that
the passenger trains run in the US are also, basically, European designs and
even such trains employ forged wheels whereas all freight cars there are fitted
with cast wheels.
India began its manufacture of wheels decades back with Durgapur Steel
Plant (DSP) developing forged wheels for locomotives and coaches and Rail Wheel
Factory, Bangalore (RWF) starting with cast wheels for freight wagons. RWF
functioned, and functions, well but another plant Rail Wheel Plant, Bela was
added in Bihar when the demand for freight wheels showed an increasing trend. Wheels
for ICF coaches were also developed by RWF and later, during my tenure at RWF,
I, with my team, successfully pushed for use of cast wheels in EMUs as well as
Kolkata Metro coaches. Meanwhile, wheels for other Metro coaches continue to be
imported as neither the Metro organizations nor IR have shown much interest in indigenization,
perhaps because the numbers involved are smaller compared to IR demands.
DSP did a good job too in supplying locomotive and ICF coaching wheels,
but beset as it is with typical PSU bureaucracy and limited R&D resources,
it could not develop, or deliver in large numbers, wheels for newer rolling
stocks like LHB coaches and EMD/ ABB locomotives and these wheels continue to
be imported in large numbers even today.
RWF developed cast wheels for locomotives and LHB coaches too but our
preference at RWF, due to assembly-line constraints, was to enter the LHB
coaching wheel segment in a big way. The problem was that there existed no
evidence of use of cast wheels in passenger trains in the speed range of 120
km/h or above. In spite of extensive trials of cast LHB wheels on-line in
coaches, albeit limited at 110 km/h operation, those who approve the use of
wheels on IR with those who oversee their work, did not have the commitment and
courage to try them out at higher speeds in LHB coaches. I. with my RWF team
pushed for it strongly but IR babudom would have none of it. (those
interested may see the content of the letter affixed at the end to get a hang
of the technical issues involved)
Soon thereafter, I moved to ICF as GM and that was the end of the story
of cast wheels for LHB coaches. Instead, IR entered into an agreement with Rashtriya
Ispat Nigam Limited (RINL) to set up a forged wheel plant at Rae Bareli to
manufacture a hundred thousand wheels per year. With this capacity, import of wheels
would be a thing of the past. The plant, I understand, is ready for long but
its commissioning is nowhere in sight, let alone its full scale operation, stuck, not surprisingly, in contractual disputes.
Let me point out a fact about RWF cast wheels which would startle you.
RWF has supplied more than 4 million wheels and barring one or two curious
cases of wheels failing after twenty years of service (a wheel has a useful life
of 3 to 5 years), not one of these has failed. Talk of Six Sigma!! This
is multiple times that. Breakage of forged wheels is not uncommon but breakage of
a cast wheel? Unheard of.
So, did the wheels for the first two rakes of Train 18 really require
import? Yes and no. We needed only 256 wheels, a very small number for a forged
wheel supplier to take interest in at a reasonable price. DSP, even if it agreed,
was not capable to engineer, manufacture and supply the wheels in only 12
months or so that it would be afforded to deliver the wheels after finalization
of our bogie design. We soon found that the best option for us was to order the
wheel sets complete on a company in Aurangabad, which, in turn, decided to
import the wheels from their principle in Czech Republic to keep the stiff
timeline in check.
I stick my neck out to say that all coaching wheels used in India,
including Train 18, LHB and Metros, can be of cast type, without any risk. I am
aware, thanks to the bard, that, “The fool doth think he is wise, but the
wise man knows himself to be a fool.” (Touchstone, As You
Like It). So, I speak like a ‘witty fool’, not a ‘foolish wit’, a la Feste
in Twelfth Night. If this confidence is too out of the line, we can plan
to test such wheels on Dynamometer test bench in Europe under suitable load and
speed conditions; it may cost a few crores but the benefit to IR would be immense, not in terms of price much as even the imported wheels are reasonably-priced,
thanks to the volumes, but for pride of true Atmanirbharata
(self-reliance).
I am not saying that given the large volume of wheels for 44 train sets
on order, we would have been able to source the wheels in India. That would
have been a tall order. But the long-term lesson that we ignore, and keep
ignoring, is that, “Our doubts are
traitors, and make us lose the good we oft might win, by fearing to attempt.”
(Lucio, Measure for Measure, Shakespeare) Yes, there is no answer, yet,
for technical pusillanimity which plagues us, we, the great status-quoists. So,
unlike the shahsavār (mounted soldier), who has
the honour of falling in battle, would we continue to be cocooned, smugly blissfully safe, like the tifl (child)
who crawls happily on his knees?
We have four wheel factories in India today. Will someone bell the cat? Unlikely for Train 18 wheels, in any case, as it is too late. But for indigenous LHB wheels, forged and cast both? Let us wait and watch.
…
Very good, nicely presented blog. Keep it up.
ReplyDeleteShukria dada
DeleteVery Well written Sir.
ReplyDeletethanks
DeleteI went through entire blog , Its lucid & unique, pleasure to go through it. Its simply igniting my curiosity about subject .
ReplyDeleteRespected Sudhansu Sir I am OHE guy , But Gradually you are diversifying my Rail interest . Thank you .
Is the axle load on a box wagon or a flat bed wagon for double stack container lower than that on a passenger coach? Secondly if speed is a constraint how does one explain goods trains on dedicated freight cars which are expected to run at 120 kmph with double stack containers when the flat bed wagons are mounted on cast iron wheels?
ReplyDeletePertinent questions but only some engineering audacity can overcome the lack of courage...DFC would be 100 km/h and not 120 km/h, by the way
DeleteSudhanshujee, since you do have the ability to think out of the box & have the experience in the manufacure of trains, I urge you to start conceptualising very light & fast trains that can run on elevated tracks in the middle of our expressways
ReplyDeleteHats off to you Sir
ReplyDelete