Exorcising the god of Jugaad: A Train 18 Tale
Jugaad—or more expressively, Jugaa.D in Roman
Hindi—is a powerful and evocative word.
According
to the Oxford Dictionary, it is a Hindi term referring to an innovative,
resourceful, and often unconventional approach to problem-solving, especially
in the face of limited resources. It typically implies quick, inexpensive, and
improvised solutions using whatever is at hand. More broadly, it encompasses
meanings like contrivance, stratagem, intrigue, or any innovative or irregular
way of repairing, mending, or solving a problem—a makeshift mechanism or
stopgap solution.
But
jugaad is more
than all this. It can also suggest spontaneity, extemporization, ad-libbing, ad
hoc responses, or even the spirit of quest, pursuit, chase, hunt, inquiry, or
exploration. In looser associations, it connects with ideas like impromptu,
expedient, improviso, autoschediasm, speaking off the cuff, acting on impulse
or in the moment, winging it, inquest, intrigue, enterprise, and quarry.
In
short, jugaad is a
rich, layered word, with multiple meanings and connotations—at once a
philosophy, a mindset, a way of life and above all, a cultural signature. Some
examples:
Din-rāt
netā rahte haiñ apnī jugāḌ meñ
un
kī balā se desh chalā jaa.e bhaaḌ meñ
(shaa.ir: Hameed Khandvi. The political leaders remain ever
entangled in their intrigues, indifferent even if the nation burns in the oven
of misery.)
Din-ba-din ho rahī hai kabaa.D zindagī
Ban gayī hai ab to jugaa.D zindagī
(shaa.ir: anonymous. Life has become a waste day-after-day, it has now been reduced to daily contrivance for survival.)
But I want to talk about the term in terms of improvisation in craftsmanship and engineering. And why? I came across this insight from my friend, Mr. Akhilesh Agarwal—an engineer not merely by qualification, but by sheer passion. A man so hands-on that, more often than not, he speaks and I listen. A devoted restorer of vintage cars, which he painstakingly rebuilds entirely on his own, he embodies the spirit of true engineering craftsmanship. If anyone understands artisanship, engineering, and manufacturing in their purest form, it is he. I, therefore, reproduce his words verbatim:
I have written on the
subject of Indian jugaad, and it's limitations As a hard core hands on
engineer, I’ve encountered many Indian craftsmen and seen terrific examples of
jugaad. I've also been on the shop floor for about 30 years as a manufacturing
manager, so. I would like to summarize my views.
Firstly, we have to recognize
that the divide between the educated officers/graduates/ engineers and the
uneducated craftsmen/ mechanics is much bigger in India than in advanced
countries. The reasons are historical, cultural, and social. Indian jugaad is
primarily done by the latter.
Indian craftsmen/
tradesmen/mechanics suffer from 3 major limitations- lack of education and so
lack of access to exposure/ knowledge such as internet and books. The second is
lack of equipment. They rarely have all the required equipment, tools and training
on how to use them. But that does not mean they do not have skills, they do.
On the other hand Indian
engineers have bookish knowledge and are not trained to applying their
knowledge to actual practical problems. So the craftsmen regard them as
theoreticians and with skepticism.
So these limitations limit
the kind of work which can be done by Indians- they can do relatively simple
jobs, but not complex high precision ones which require education, training and
equipment.
To give you an example: I recently went to a vendor who has a CNC
router for a job work. The vendor did not have an educated and trained
programmer. The operator was not trained and skilled in operation of his
machine. So we found it challenging to do even 2d work, while the machine was
capable of even 3d work.
Modern manufacturing
requires a large number of educated and skilled workers, just a few educated
engineers supervising them does not suffice. High precision requires
sophisticated equipment. Using them and maintaining them again requires
educated and skilled workforce.
So while Indians can excel
at an individual level by their jugaad, at an organized collective level, which
is what modern manufacturing is, jugaad is not sufficient.
To give another example, no
amount of Indian jugaad will enable India to manufacture jet engines. It
requires innovation yes, but Indian jugaad can't send you to the moon.
I
could not agree more—jugaad must end where real engineering begins.
While the ingenuity behind our jugaad culture is admirable and even
inspiring, India cannot aspire to become a global manufacturing hub for
high-quality products unless this mindset is consciously reined in. In the
realm of manufacturing, jugaad must be completely banished—best reserved
for emergency fixes and temporary solutions in the domain of desperate repair
and rehab—and never as a substitute for precision, process discipline, and
engineering accuracy and excellence.
Let
me recall an anecdote from my time helming the design and manufacture of Train
18—the Vande Bharat Express—as the GM at the Integral Coach Factory in Chennai,
regarding our experience with European consultants, in this case, a
well-regarded Polish firm. Working with them had its own charm. They came from
a world where railway systems had long since scaled the heights of technology.
Without ever being condescending, they radiated a quiet confidence—as if to
say, you are near the pits today, but you
have got promise, and the only way is up. Our collaboration was not
a series of meetings but a flowing continuum, even as ICF's design wheels kept
turning at full speed.
At one of our early meetings, the head
of their delegation made a small speech. They, he said, were acknowledged
experts in bogie design—masters of design, analysis, and validation. Their
creations were already running successfully across Europe. He went on to note,
with a polite touch of pride, that they combined hands-on operational
experience with formidable analytical depth; that few others in the consulting
world could match their pedigree. “Seventy-five percent of our team,” he added,
“are qualified engineers, and ninety percent speak good English.”
I smiled and responded, “Come, work
alongside my team. They too have built numerous designs, perhaps more than
you—yes, over borrowed platforms like Schlieren and LHB—but they have imbibed
and innovated with unmatched zeal. Their English may be accented and modest,
but they speak one language flawlessly and with one voice: technical audacity—now
fully embodied in Train 18. Come, and learn this language from them.”
Once,
a group from the body design consultants walked into my office, visibly
agitated-eyebrows raised, drawings clutched tighter than usual. One of them blurted
out, half-exasperated, half-bewildered, “The culture at ICF, it seems, is to produce
in abundance. You churn out more coaches in a month than a
mid-sized European factory manages in a whole year! But... no two coaches are
truly identical. They may look alike, but under the
surface, it is all jugaad holding them together. Please, we
request you—Train 18 must be a clean slate. Let your team forget jugaad,
and together, we shall craft something truly world-class.”
Jugaad? I smiled. They had clearly done
their homework on Indian engineering quirks. Yes, jugaad—something
that evokes images of rope-and-stick fixes-but in our ecosystem, jugaad is
more than duct tape and divine luck. It is often the handiwork of gritty,
inspired technicians and their supervisors. When crisis strikes—and it
frequently does—our shop floor wizards do not panic. They innovate. They
conjure solutions out of chaos. The result may fall short of a textbook fix,
but it gets the job done.
I laughed with them and reassured them
earnestly: “Train 18 will be our leap into a new era—jugaad-free, clean,
and proud.”
Easier
said than done. For you see, jugaad is not just a habit—it is a resident
deity in our industrial psyche. It thrives in the cracks of our processes. We
neglect precision upstream, and when the assembly line starts moaning and
groaning, the Jugaad
God is summoned. He appears promptly, anointing our sins with
temporary blessings. The job at hand is coaxed to life again, and after the
obligatory genuflection, we march right back to our merry ways.
To capture this cyclical absurdity, I
have taken the liberty of hypercorrecting a humorous creation by the poet Amir
Ameer. It perfectly distills the spirit of our relationship with jugaad:
Ye
merī aadat se merī fitrat hī ho chalā hai
Kyā khuub diyā hai mujh
ko bigaa.D aise
Hazār
minnat hazār minnat hazār mehnat
kucch banāne ko hī to haiñ jugaa.D aise
(From my habit, it is now my nature as it has so nicely spoilt me.
A thousand entreaties, so much daring and all this labour of jugaad are
employed only to build something.)
Though
daunting at first, we took it upon ourselves to usher in this change. The
mission began with sensitizing our production teams—seasoned hands who had long
relied on instinct and improvisation. But more than talk, it needed structural
change. We reorganized our workflow to ensure that a dedicated, handpicked team
took charge of manufacturing the body shell—the sacred spring from which
the rest of the train flows. For if the shell is flawed, it sets off a chain
reaction, and pronto, the old Jugaad God is back on his throne.
Did we banish him entirely? Perhaps not.
But we did push him far from the sanctum. In place of patches and fixes, we
laid foundations. And in that quantum leap—from make-do
to made
right—we found the first heartbeat of a near world-class train. Not
perfect, but proud. Not jugaad-born, but engineered in earnest.
Train
18/Vande Bharat was not just a train; it was our declaration that India could
rise above jugaad—not by simply disowning it, but by
outgrowing it in baby steps.
...
Whereas jugaad may be a pejorative term given to shop floor innovations, there is certainly something to flow back from the shop floor to the designers. When the same jugaad is applied by managers and executives in taking a decision “based on my hunch”, is that not a jugaad as well?
ReplyDeleteWhat is a hunch? And, from there follows the question what is a jugaad. In my interpretation a hunch or gut-feeling is the art of solving for n variables with n-1 equations something a mathematician would say was impossible. Yet the CEO, or the CFO of a company does that often. Why then deny the same freedom to the shop floor artisans or the works manager?
I, however, agree that jugaads are not scalable, not with the variations that each jugaad brings in. But maybe if the designers shed their ego and incorporate some of that jugaad in the basic design, it could bring about speed and economy in production systems.
Thanks 🙏
DeleteThe term Jugaad is often referred to a make shift arrangement employed by the shop floor personnels/technicians if things Products/ components to be assembled are not found identical in all respect. This is where Standardisation of components and perfect interchangeability is desirable. This is possible only with full automation and perfect skill.Well ,it is certainly not desired to always adopt Jugaad in an assembly line but sometimes it may be the solution to finish the work. Often Jugaads are found to be more effective besides being cheaper.
DeleteThe way Engineering Graduates are selected in Government Services (Group A) after qualifying a written examination without having any professional experience in the field also needs changed. When they join any organised service in Government sector, they join with a pre-set assumptions that they are Managers. Managers of Craftsman and not Engineer. Seldom,they try in hand experience with tools behind machines themselves. They see themselves as holding a Competent Authority position of clearing administrative and technical files only.
ReplyDeleteIn present scenario we all are aware who all join PSU and Government organization as Engineer (Mostly those who don't get good campus placement).Expecting such Engineering Graduate to do Miracles is itself a wrong expectation.
Recruitment of technician in Non Gazetted level is also somewhat similar. With several back door recruitment method available like largees, Compassionate Appointment, LDCE and GDCE (conducted in house) only 30 percent direct recruitment through open examination.
To change the Jugad mindset change should start from the level of recruitment at both Gazetted (Engineer Group A)and Non Gazetted (technician) level.
Regards
Prabhat Sharma
(Second innings as Chief Staff & Welfare inspector in Railway) and Ex Sergeant (Technical Group X) having 20 years technical experience on MIG 21 T 96,Su-30 K and Su-30 MKI aircrafts.
Excellent Sir.👍🙏🏼
ReplyDeleteJugad could be justified in say a battle field scenario where its a question of survival. Though I have seen tremendous amount of agility with our ground level staff, like they could keep the Hegenschiet Wheel lathes working even during the years 1982/85, when the imports were practically stopped, in today's world it simply implies inefficiencies and compromise to work. There are plenty of examples when we fail to provide the materials in time and then expect our junior staff to somehow manage the out turn. And another example common in the private sector is to compromise on quality by using just substandard materials as a substitute to increase their profits. And calling it necessary jugad for survival. I think this mindset causes more problems than solutions
ReplyDelete