The Great IRMS Hoopla: From Backbones to Crabs


Four years ago, the Indian Railways Management Service (IRMS) was launched with great fanfare, its mission as lofty as a mountain peak: to unite eight warring railway services into one harmonious entity and finally exorcise the ghost of departmentalism. Alas, the noble vision soon developed cracks so wide you could drive a Vande Bharat train through them. After a circus of flip-flops that would make acrobats weep with envy, the government hit the reset button and announced a return to the good old recruitment system through the Civil Services Examination (CSE) and Engineering Services Examination (ESE)—an old habit dressed up as a shiny new plan. To rub salt into the wound, the buzzword ‘IRMS’—already a term that managed to mean everything and nothing at once—was not discarded but cynically retained, as if to convince everyone that this was not a retreat, but rather a strategic tweak. Officers will now flaunt their departments, thinly disguised as sub-cadres, with labels like IRMS (Traffic), IRMS (Mechanical), IRMS (Accounts), IRMS (Civil), and so on, as if the parentheses were enchanted cloaks deftly concealing the same old rivalries simmering underneath. Although the bard suggested through the king in Henry VIII that, “Things done well, And with a care, exempt themselves from fear; Things done without example, in their issue Are to be fear'd...”, IRMS has become such a thoughtless bingo that we are past fearing. 

I have written plenty on this subject in newspapers and on my blog, so those interested can find all the riveting details at the links I have stashed at the end. But for now, let us leave the beaten track and venture into a realm where reason meets absurdity—because, try as I might, this jungle story, although completely unrelated, keeps clawing its way into my thoughts. So, let me indulge you with it. 

In a jungle not unlike our bustling human societies, there existed a lively mix of eight species of arboreal creatures—monkeys with their noisy chatter, officious parrots that recited edicts, chameleons skilled in the art of blending in, and snails that measured progress in millimetres. Lizards basked lazily, claiming credit for catching flies they never chased, sheep huddled nervously and followed the loudest bleat, squirrels darted around storing nuts of dubious value, and cats lounged with an air of entitlement, convinced they were the true rulers, despite never lifting a paw. Each animal had a nominal backbone, their unique strengths, or so they pretended. But as they aspired to higher branches, their backbones seemed to shrivel, replaced by a newfound flexibility that served their ambitions well. The bard might well have transported the nubile Anne from The Merry Wives of Windsor to observe ruefully, “…O, what a world of vile, ill-favour’d faults Looks handsome as a railway babu, er, (tree) branch officer.” 

The jungle’s overseer, seeking order in this arboreal chaos, decided that true unity lay not in differences but in the absence of them. And so, with a flourish befitting a ruler prone to whimsy, he declared, in the spirit of the bard’s ‘all the world’s a stage’ that 'a jungle must be all things to all beasts, and at last, no beast at all'. Thus, the animals were rechristened crabs, and stripped of their backbones completely to remove the illness from the root itself and to better embody a new era of camaraderie—camaraderie defined by the renowned crab principle of collective descent. All animals had to forget begetting their own kind—everyone would just make crabs. 

It was proclaimed that all crabs were equal, but in a classic case of crab logic, some crabs were evidently more equal than others. These privileged crustaceans, glittering with an extra sheen of favouritism, were handpicked and chosen—though the selection process was shrouded in the smoke and mirrors of a 360-degree survey among the ex-invertebrates. Naturally, this survey was as useful as a crab trying to swim; it left everyone scratching their heads, wondering if the only criteria were who could pinch the hardest or perform the best at the annual crab dance-off.

Nevertheless, the crabs, for their part, adjusted swiftly. The chameleons excelled at seeming like any other crab when needed, while the parrots took to regaling the jungle with, a la Macbeth, “…full of sound and fury, signifying nothing”. Monkeys retained their old mischief but now declared it crab-like ingenuity, crafting elaborate schemes to pilfer snacks from the unsuspecting. Meanwhile, the lizards basked in the sun, convinced they were the original trendsetters, while sheep huddled nervously, bleating motivational slogans like, 'Teamwork makes the dream work!'—though they rarely ventured outside their comfort zone. Squirrels, ever the hoarders, engaged in frantic debates about the best stash spots, while the cats lounged with their characteristic nonchalance, all while ignoring the chaos around them.

Yet all these crabified animals craved for some semblance of distinction and true unification to ‘the complete crab’ did not happen. The overseer, in his wisdom, realized that a crab's shell was more ornamental than functional: it cracked easily under pressure but gleamed beautifully from a distance. The scheme’s cracks widened. Recruitment for new crabs fell short and wise, cynical owls, who were watching the fun from a neutral perch in between reading A Midsummer Night’s Dream, muttered in disapproval from their nocturnal posts: “…Lord, what fools these crabs (and crab drivers) be!”

With crabs floundering and fresh crab talent scarce, the overseer hatched a new plan. The jungle management played a Juliet and declared that all animals, despite their crabby accoutrements, would retain their original identity in parenthesis: monkey-crabs became crab (monkey), parrot-crab became crab (parrot), chameleon-crab became crab (chameleon) and so forth, as after all, “...What’s in a name? That which we call a crab by any other name would scuttle as sly...”.

Now, the owls wait with bated breath as uneasy lies the owl that only observes. Will these make-believe crabs, with a shadow of their former vertebrate selves weighing heavily on them, claw their way into prosperity or pull each other into the leafy depths from which they came?

As the crabs cast their eyes upon the jungle canopy, wondering if the next storm would break them or forge them, the wise eyes of old owl observers watched, and recalling Edmund, muttered pensively, “…The wheel is come full circle…”. The jungle paused, knowing that no matter the titles, no matter the changes, a crab would still find its way sideways.

Links to recent writings:

https://anindecisiveindian.blogspot.com/2024/10/irms-mother-of-all-rollbacks-announce.html

https://anindecisiveindian.blogspot.com/2024/08/irms-cure-worse-than-disease-infinitely.html

https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/imrs-on-the-wrong-track/article68706529.ece

https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/railway-recruitment-policy-going-off-track/article65211192.ece






Comments

  1. IRMS is totally a mess.

    Corrections to the plan are welcome but what about those smart managers whose careers were ruined in the early stages of this experiment?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks sir 🙏🏻 Grateful Information sir

    ReplyDelete
  3. IRMS: A Glimpse at the Broader Challenges

    The IRMS saga is not an isolated incident; it is symptomatic of a deeper, more widespread dysfunction. Indian Railways is grappling with multiple challenges that go beyond administrative restructuring.

    Aging Infrastructure: Despite the government's push for modernization, from semi-high-speed Vande Bharat trains to station revamps, vast stretches of tracks, bridges, and signaling systems remain outdated. Maintenance issues often result in derailments and safety lapses, eroding public trust.

    Financial Strains: With fares kept low for political reasons and cross-subsidies from freight to passenger services being unsustainable, the Railways has long been burdened by financial constraints. The pandemic worsened this scenario, slashing revenues and putting a strain on its operating margins.

    Project Delays: Whether it is the ambitious Dedicated Freight Corridor or plans for high-speed rail, the execution speed of large-scale projects has often been slower than expected. Land acquisition, bureaucratic red tape, and litigation have stalled projects that could otherwise transform India’s rail transport landscape.

    Workforce Challenges: Indian Railways employs over a million people, making it one of the world's largest employers. Yet, this workforce is heavily unionized, and any attempts at reform often meet with resistance. The skills gap in an era where technology is transforming rail operations is another looming issue.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Excellent depiction.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What an excellent read...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Brilliant read. Such deft use of words as always. :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Google it "British Officers in Indian Railways".

    Please read comments of this article, to get to know more about IRMS and Indian Railways:

    https://theprint.in/opinion/removing-tech-entrance-railways-wasnt-feasible-reinstatement-mere-course-correction/2311688/

    ReplyDelete
  8. Waah, biting, satirical but also humourous.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What an intriguing analogy between railway bureaucracy and jungle creatures! The satire here feels all too real, capturing the ironies of organizational restructuring perfectly
    Warehouse rack manufacturers India
    Heavy duty racks in delhi

    ReplyDelete
  10. The use of Shakespearean quotes adds a sophisticated touch to this critique. It feels like the bard himself would chuckle at the modern circus of IRMS transformations
    Modular office furniture in delhi
    Warehouse rack in hyderabad

    ReplyDelete
  11. Stripping departments down only to rename them doesn’t sound like reform, but rather a fancy way of keeping the old divisions intact. A classic case of ‘new bottle, old wine
    heavy duty rack manufacturer
    Cyclone Dust Collector manufacturer

    ReplyDelete
  12. The crab metaphor really drives home the point about individual identity getting lost in the name of unity. Is this where our system is headed
    Wood Dust Collector
    Tea Pouch packing machine manufacturer

    ReplyDelete
  13. This jungle story is a perfect satire on the rigidity disguised as flexibility within bureaucratic setups. It’s amusing yet so accurate
    Shrink tunnel manufacturer
    CNC laser cutting machine in delhi

    ReplyDelete
  14. The author highlights a great point about 'strategic tweaks' versus genuine change. If these adjustments don’t address core issues, then what’s the real purpose behind them
    Franchise for sale
    Supreme Court lawyer in Noida

    ReplyDelete
  15. The shift from ‘backbones’ to ‘crabs’ feels like a downgrade. Are we fostering versatility or just creating new labels for the same roles
    Carrier Oil Saw PalMetto Manufacturer in Germany
    Sea Buckthorn Oil Manufacturer Italy

    ReplyDelete
  16. Reading about ‘crab logic’ made me laugh, but it’s so true! All too often, reorganizations look equitable on paper but only reinforce existing hierarchies
    Serenoa Repens Oil Manufacturer in Korea
    SEO Company

    ReplyDelete
  17. As a reader, I’m left wondering: is this system more about appearances than actual functional improvement? The jungle metaphor hits the nail on the head.
    Sparsh Bagga
    Sparsh Bagga

    ReplyDelete
  18. It’s ironic how IRMS was meant to unify, but the restructuring only seems to deepen the divides. How will this affect morale in the long run
    dairy queen franchise
    5Movierulz

    ReplyDelete
  19. This 'crab' transformation feels more like an identity crisis than progress. Why not focus on real reforms rather than cosmetic changes
    5movierulz
    MoviezWap

    ReplyDelete
  20. Love the observation on ‘smoke and mirrors’ in the selection process! It’s often these unseen biases that end up perpetuating the same problems
    Mezzanine floor Manufacturer in Delhi
    industrial storage rack in noida

    ReplyDelete
  21. This was really informative! I didn’t realize every shop and establishment needs to register within 30 days of starting their business. This clarifies a lot for new business owners
    Conveyor manufacturer in India
    Office Furniture Manufacturer Gurgaon

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IRMS, a cure worse than the disease: Infinitely Redundant Management Service

Guard Your Legacy, ICF! Why Surrender Your Crown?

High-Speed Talgo Trains in Uzbekistan Much faster than Vande Bharat!