When Institutions Fail Women
Tata Consultancy
Services (TCS) is facing a deeply
disturbing controversy after serious allegations emerged from its Nashik BPO
unit. Following an undercover operation by the Nashik Police, in which women
officers posed as housekeeping staff, what has come to light points to far more
than isolated misconduct. Preliminary reports suggest that for over three
years, multiple female employees were subjected to sexual harassment, including
stalking, exploitation and molestation, along with alarming allegations of
religious coercion, with claims that women were pressured to perform namaz,
consume beef against their beliefs, and even consider conversion.
The gravity of these allegations cannot be overstated, with victims
stating that their repeated complaints were dismissed by HR manager Nida Khan
and others as something “common in MNC culture”, reflecting not just apathy but
a deeply entrenched culture that normalises abuse. Nine FIRs have been
registered and at least seven arrests made, including six team leaders and an
HR official, while some of the key accused, particularly Nida Khan, remain
absconding, pointing to systemic failure at TCS rather than isolated
wrongdoing.
The company’s response has, so far, been abysmal. Chairman Natarajan Chandrasekaran has termed the incident
“gravely concerning” and asked COO Aarthi
Subramanian to lead an internal inquiry, an understatement of what is
expected and clearly insufficient for a Tata group arm that prides itself on
ethical leadership and culture. This outrage demanded visible and immediate
accountability, and the absence of decisive action at the local leadership
level raises serious concerns, warranting responsibility to be fixed at the
highest levels, including the head of the Nashik unit.
While allegations of religious coercion are serious and must be pursued
under the law, the issue I wish to underline is the safety, dignity, and
equality of women in the workplace. No organisation today can claim credibility
if it fails to ensure a harassment-free environment, as this is not about
optics but basic human dignity; a workplace where women function under fear is
fundamentally broken, and if these allegations are proven, the response must go
beyond punishing individuals to confronting institutional failure with honesty
and resolve.
“Frailty, thy name is
woman,” says Hamlet, reflecting
the prejudice of his time. That notion never held true. If anything, it is the
frailty of the male mind that has perpetuated it. Any organisation that does
not treat men and women equally is building on weak foundations. Equality
demands zero tolerance for gender-based misconduct and a clear commitment to
women’s empowerment, not mere lip service.
The Vishaka Guidelines, laid down by the Supreme Court in 1997,
required employers to prevent and address sexual harassment at the workplace,
and were later reinforced through the Sexual
Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention,
Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (SHWW Act or PoSH Act), which mandates the constitution of an Internal
Complaints Committee (ICC) in every organisation, headed by a woman.
Yet, such safeguards are often followed more in violation than in
practice. I have seen numerous instances through relatives, friends, and wider
circles. Anecdotal evidence aside, this is something all of us have encountered through national and local
news; unfortunately, our society often excuses even major transgressions and
persuades or browbeats victims into silence, with both government and private
organisations equally culpable and enforcement remaining weak.
In my own limited way, I have tried to deal with this menace firmly and
in a no-nonsense manner, believing and conveying to managers across the
hierarchy that this rigmarole of enquiries and depositions is fine, but we as
administrators must go beyond, even if it means leaning strongly towards the
woman’s version.
I have often found that guidelines alone are not enough in such cases,
and administrators must act with clarity and conviction. Let me recount my
experience towards the end of my career as GM in-charge at the Integral Coach Factory (ICF), Chennai, where
incidentally the Vande Bharat Express was
conceived and developed during my tenure.
Very early in my tenure at ICF, I was informed of a case that had been
quietly buried. An employee, in an inebriated state, had barged into the hostel
room of two female employees and attempted to molest one of them. He escaped,
no disciplinary action was taken due to lackadaisical follow-up, and the women
eventually withdrew the complaint. The matter had simply faded away.
I reacted sharply and immediately convened a meeting
with Mohan Raja, the Chief Personnel Manager, a fine executive too, and his
team. We decided that he would verify the facts informally but rigorously, and
if found true, the employee would be dismissed the same day. The Government of
India empowers such action where enquiry is not feasible, and if this was not
such a case, none would be. By evening, the dismissal order was issued. When a
Personnel officer remarked that the man had a family to feed, I responded that
compassion has its place, but not at the cost of justice, and in any case, we
were simple administrators, not judges hearing cases for eternity.
There were four such major incidents over the next year, and we dealt
with all of them similarly: summary dismissal. Once satisfied about the genuineness of a
complaint, we avoided subjecting the complainant to the ordeal of enquiries and
testimony and ensured swift action, while in minor cases, measures such as
removal from the workplace and public censure sent a clear message. There was
also one instance of a false allegation, which after informal verification led
to the woman employee being reassigned to a more demanding role with strict
compliance expectations.
At the same time, women were encouraged to challenge themselves
vis-à-vis men in terms of output, and many rose to the occasion. From being
seen as helpers in skilled roles, they moved into positions of leadership as
technicians. We formed twenty all-women groups, known as Mahila Shakthi
gangs, delivering output equal to or better than their male counterparts.
The heavy fabrication group deserves special mention. It is rare in Indian industry to see a team of thirty women welders and fitters independently manufacturing something heavy, like in our case, a coach shell, through heavy fitting, welding and lifting. This also shows in tittle as well this image of the women in their work uniforms, which was splashed across the national press; you can also see them in action in the coverage video shared below:
Mahila Shakti: ICF's women team behind trains
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk2IgX1eipI
There
are encouraging examples. Maruti Suzuki India
Limited has increased the participation of women in manufacturing roles
at its Gurugram and Manesar plants, deploying over 190 women on the shop floor
in a year and taking the total across functions to over 1,300, all receiving
the same training and opportunities as men. This is the direction industry must
take.
The TCS
episode must serve as a wake-up call. Institutions decline when misconduct is
ignored and accountability is delayed; rebuilding trust requires nothing less
than swift, transparent action. As I recall the words of Jaishankar Prasad, I would
tweak it: 'Nari tum kewal shraddha nahin ho, aur bahut kuchh ho’.
A woman is not merely an object
of reverence; she is an equal participant in every sphere, and any workplace
that fails to recognise this diminishes itself.
I am inclined
to end this with a sense of hope that justice will prevail. I am reminded of
the words of Launcelot Gobbo in Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice,
who, in a moment of clarity, reminds us: “Truth will come to light;
murder cannot be hid long... at the length truth will out."
…


Well written—but sexual harassment isn’t a one-gender issue anymore. It’s fundamentally about power imbalance. Whoever holds dominance can misuse it, regardless of gender. The conversation should evolve accordingly.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteTrue but what should worry us is what is predominant.
Delete